The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The gist of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable that the original court’s imprisonment (six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. Although the judgment does not have the same criminal record for the defendant and the confessions of the crime are made, considering the fact that the victim wanted to impose severe punishment on the defendant because the victim failed to repay the damage even though the amount of deception is not much, and the circumstances constituting the conditions for sentencing as indicated in the instant case, such as character, conduct, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, etc., such as the circumstances after the crime, are too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is without merit and it is so decided as per Disposition in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act.