1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. The relationship between the parties (1) The Plaintiff is the president operating the “F Child Care Center” located in Ulsandong-gu E (hereinafter “instant Child Care Center”). Defendant B and Defendant C admitted A to the instant Child Care Center around March 201.

(2) Defendant Korea Broadcasting System (hereinafter “Defendant Broadcasting System”) is a terrestrial broadcasting company that reported each of the reports listed in the attached list (hereinafter “each of the news reports of this case”) to the effect that the instant child care center abused a child, and Defendant D is the reporter of Defendant Corporation’s H.

B. Defendant B and C’s suspicions and reporting of MBC Broadcasting Station (1) around March 201, Defendant B and Defendant C admitted children to the instant childcare center operated by the Plaintiff. It is believed that the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff and the teachers, who operated the instant childcare center, committed assault on G. On the other hand, requesting the Plaintiff to find out in the instant childcare center and present CCTV installed in the childcare center, and requesting the Plaintiff to show the CCTV image.

(2) Defendant B and Defendant C reported the CCTV image shown by the Plaintiff as a child abuse case at the Ulsan MBC Broadcasting Station (hereinafter “instant video”), and on April 22, 201, the Ulsan MBC reported that the “child-care center teacher” was a child abuse case at the child-care center around 9:30.

C. As a result of the investigation conducted by the specialized child protection agencies in Ulsan Metropolitan City, the Plaintiff was subject to the investigation conducted by the specialized child protection agencies and the investigative agencies on April 201, 201. On May 201, the Ulsan Metropolitan City specialized child protection agencies in Ulsan Metropolitan City determined whether there was child abuse at child care centers in the instant case operated by the Plaintiff, which was a suspected case of child abuse at the time of receipt of the report, but the contents identified at the time of the on-site investigation were not different from the reported contents.

(2) Ulsan.