logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.12.21 2017고단5049
업무상횡령등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

From October 2013 to November 2016, the Defendant: (a) registered and deposited the sales generated from the leased store at the south point of the victim C Co., Ltd. located at the time of harmony with the customer center (POS) in the account book (POS) kept at the customer center.

1. Occupational embezzlement;

A. A. Around September 30, 2016, the Defendant embezzled cash sales amounting to KRW 381,00,000 received from D, a tenant company, at the south point of the above direction, for the victim’s business, without registering or depositing it with POS, brought to death thereafter. From July 2016 to October 2016, the Defendant embezzled eight times in the same manner, as in the attached Table 1, the sum of KRW 6,931,70 on eight occasions from July 2016 to October 2016, while working for the victim. B. Around October 2016, the embezzlement of the amount deposited by the Defendant’s account, the Defendant received KRW 1,085,200 from the occupant company E in the same place to his/her account, and embezzled and embezzled the amount for the purpose of his/her business for his/her own account, without making a registration and making a voluntary deposit in the POS for the purpose of his/her own account.

2. On September 16, 2016, the Defendant entered and deposited F’s cash sales amount of KRW 2,652,000 in the same place with POS, and then falsely concluded that “The Defendant consulted with the person in charge of the occupation and use company entering the customer center on the fact that he/she consulted with the person in charge of the occupation and use company entering the customer center.”

However, it did not cancel cash sales in consultation with the real-time shop occupants.

As such, the Defendant deceptioned the person in charge of the above customer center, and received KRW 2,652,00 from the injured party as a gold for the return of cash sales, and received KRW 17,247,100,00 in total from July 23, 2016 to September 30, 2016 in the same manner as in attached Table 2, 17,247,100 from July 23, 2016.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the police statement related to G;

1. Complaints of C stock companies;

1.The laws and regulations governing the sale and return of goods by enterprise at each date.

arrow