A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On December 2, 2014, the Defendant drafted a false complaint against D through the aforementioned B with a view to having D receive criminal punishment at the office of law in Dobong-gu Seoul, Seoul, for the purpose of having D receive criminal punishment.

The criminal complaint states that "D, around August 2013, developed the housing site of Gyeonggi-gun owned by the defendant and then, from March 2014 to April 2014 of the same year, D arbitrarily sold and stolen the soil and stone equivalent to KRW 1,1140,00 for five tons of truck 10,000 through four times without the defendant's consent, and that "the defendant punished for larceny." The defendant consented to dispose of the soil and stone to the above D to remove them, and therefore, D did not have stolen the soil and stone.

Nevertheless, on December 23, 2014, the defendant submitted a written complaint by mail to an employee who is unable to know his/her name at the public service center of the Bupyeong-gu Police Station located in Bupyeong-gu, Bupyeong-gu, Bupyeong-gu.

Accordingly, the defendant reported false facts to public offices, and made a false accusation against D.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of the witness D, F, G, H, and I;

1. Copy of each police statement made by the defendant;

1. A copy of each protocol concerning the examination of suspect with regard to D (including part concerning the examination of suspect against the defendant);

1. Copy of the complaint;

1. A copy of the real estate sale and development agreement and a copy of the notification of building permission (the defendant, while entering into a real estate development agreement with D, agreed to bear all expenses necessary for the development of real estate and obtain various authorizations and permissions, selling real estate thereafter, agreed to distribute the proceeds therefrom, and as a result, D took out soil and stone in the process of developing real estate as a housing site, and D appears to have sold some of them and appropriated them for development costs, while living in the vicinity of the housing site, and even the defendant did not raise any objection even though he had been aware of the above process.