1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is a company that operates the lubrication treatment, etc., and the Defendant is an organization that consists of the lubialbuk-do Motor Vehicle Maintenance Business Operator.

Defendant Branch, Defendant Branch, Defendant Branch, Defendant Branch, Plaintiff Agro, Musan, Clock, Simcheon, Cheongcheon, Cheongcheon, Cheongcheon, Cheongdo, Cheongdo, Medical Service, Mawning, Cheongong, Cheongna, Angeuk, Racing, Permanent Residence, Young, U.S.C. S. S. S. S., Non-G., Non-Party Agradern Energy-Related Matters

B. The Plaintiff, leather Co., Ltd., New Energy Industries Co., Ltd., and Cream Korea Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Co., Ltd.” in the names of each of the above companies are omitted), etc. have been engaged in the purchase and disposal of wastes, such as waste lux and waste lux, etc., belonging to the Defendant Branch by June 2017, pursuant to the “Entrustment Contract for the Management of Designated Wastes in 2016,” which was concluded with the Defendant.

C. Around March 2017, the Defendant sent a notice to the effect that “the Defendant’s entrustment contract for the disposal of designated wastes in 2016 to the Plaintiff, leather, the nature of the corporation (hereinafter “natural and future”), the new energy architecture, and the Clin Korea is terminated on June 30, 2017, and that “the Defendant’s participation in a new contract and the details of the contract amount, etc. are sent by mail” until April 15, 2017.

Defendant branch of the Subdivision, racing, Andong, Maldong, Sildong, Gulcheon, Yancheon, Gulcheon, Dokcheon, Dokyeong, Dokyeong, Dokdae, Dokdae, Dokdae, military rank, salary, morals, Cheongna, Cheongna, Ulsan, U.S., U.S., U.S., U.S., and U.S.

D. Of the companies to which the foregoing notice was delivered, companies which concluded an entrustment contract with the Defendant for the disposal of designated wastes in 2017 are as follows:

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1-3, Eul evidence Nos. 1, 10, 19, 23 (including each number), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The Plaintiff’s assertion is seeking confirmation of invalidity of a contract as follows and seeking confirmation of the status of a successful bidder.

A claim for confirmation of invalidity of a contract.