Text
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
Reasons
1. The gist of the grounds for appeal is that the lower court’s punishment (six months of imprisonment with prison labor for each of the crimes of the first instance court 2018 High Court 2018 High Court 1967 and one year and six months of imprisonment with prison labor for the remaining crimes, and 2940,000 won for additional collection)
2. The lower court determined that the Defendant committed the same crime without being sentenced to punishment due to fraud, etc., and committed the same crime again without being sentenced to punishment for the same kind of crime until now, in particular, for a period of four months and less than four months, considering the following factors: (a) the circumstances favorable to the Defendant [i] [i], certain crimes (i.e., confession and reflects; (ii) the equity with the case of the judgment at the same time as the judgment in which the judgment became final and conclusive; (iii) some victims (F, B, and H); (iv) the crime of Bophishing was committed with dosing intentional intent; and (iv) the Defendant’s profits acquired therefrom are not much high; and (v) the crime was committed in light of the contents of the crime committed; (iv) the injury was not completely recovered until now; (iv) the same type of crime was committed; and (v) the same was committed again without being agreed with the victim during the trial period; and (v) the Defendant did not appear at the date of trial; and (v) the Defendant took part in the Defendant of this case in China.
The defendant agreed with U.S. and AF in the trial.
However, the circumstances unfavorable to the defendant in the decision of the court below, the amount of damage of U and F, the defendant's participation in remittance from the crime of Bophishing fraud, the victim's five persons, the total amount of damage is 25.1 billion won, the total amount of damage is significant. The crime of Bophishing is very harmful to society, the crime of Bophishing is committed systematically and systematically against many and unspecified persons, and the subordinate staff who participated only in part of the crime is in need of strict punishment, and the defendant's age, character and behavior, motive and background of the crime.