logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2016.04.29 2016고단314
사기
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2016 Highest 314"

1. On February 22, 2016, the Defendant: (a) committed an act as if the Defendant would normally pay the taxi fee in the 337-on-ro, Yok-gu, Yok-gu, YY-si; (b) was boarding a taxi driven by the victim C; and (c) up to 26, the Defendant used the victim’s taxi on board the 5-ro, YY-gu, Seongbuk-gu, YY-gu, YY-gu, YY-gu, YY

However, the defendant did not have any intention or ability to pay taxi charges normally.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as such, had the victim operate the taxi as above, obtained pecuniary benefits equivalent to KRW 100,800,000, by having the victim operate the taxi.

2. On February 25, 2016, around 15:50 on February 25, 2016, the Defendant issued orders to the victim D management F of the victim D in Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, to the victim as if he would normally pay the meal cost, and the victim can be safe from the victim and the victim.

However, the defendant did not have any intention or ability to pay the food cost.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as such, received food equivalent to KRW 37,700,00 in total from the injured party and received such food, but did not pay the price.

3. On February 27, 2016, at around 13:00 on February 27, 2016, the Defendant issued an order to the victim G with a “I” restaurant for the operation of the Victim G located in the Northern-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, as if he would normally pay the meal cost, and ordered the victim to pay the said meal cost.

However, the defendant did not have any intention or ability to pay the food cost.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received food equivalent to KRW 30,000,00 in total from the damaged party, and did not pay the amount, thereby acquiring property benefits equivalent to the same amount.

4. To the injured party J.

arrow