logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2013.08.29 2013고단4271
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On July 21, 2011, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 1.5 million by the Daegu District Court for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act, and a fine of KRW 3 million by the same court on March 8, 2012 for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act.

On June 15, 2013, at around 23:00, the Defendant driven B vehicles under the influence of alcohol content of 0.156% without obtaining a driver’s license, from the 1.5km section to the front of the high village underground car in the west-gu Northwest-gu, Daegu, North-gu, Daegu, the Defendant was driving the B vehicles under the influence of alcohol content of 0.156% without obtaining a driver’s license.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Examination protocol of the accused by prosecution;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. The circumstantial statement of the employee;

1. Inquiry into the result of the crackdown on drinking driving;

1. Registers of driver's licenses;

1. Records before judgment: Application of inquiry reports on criminal records, etc. and investigation reports (Attachment to the same summary order) Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant provisions of Article 148-2 (1) 1, and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting a crime (the point of a sound driving) and subparagraph 1 of Article 152 of the Road Traffic Act and Articles 152 and 43 of the Road Traffic Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Although the punishment of the defendant for the reason of sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act of the order to attend a compliance driving lecture is important, the punishment as ordered shall be determined in consideration of all the normal data shown in the trial process, such as the fact that the defendant has no criminal record of the same kind of criminal record or higher, the blood alcohol concentration level, driving distance, the defendant's age, occupation, family relation

arrow