logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2015.12.23 2015나1965
손해배상
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

purport.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On February 20, 2012, the Plaintiff: (a) purchased 403 officetel 4 (hereinafter “instant sales contract”; and (b) concluded a sales contract (Evidence A No. 1-2) with the Bank on April 2012; and (c) borrowed 35.9 million won from the Bank from the Republic of Korea on four occasions from that time to that time on the instant sales contract with the Bank; and (d) around March 2013, the Defendant performed business related to the loan of the instant officetel 403 at the Bank D branch.

B. There was a conflict between the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff on the grounds that the scheduled date of occupancy specified in the instant sales contract has been postponed several times, etc. As a result of the postponement of the scheduled date of occupancy, an intermediate payment loan agreement between the Plaintiff and the Bank was extended from April 19, 2013 to August 19, 2013, and again extended on October 18, 2013.

C. On October 18, 2013, the Plaintiff, who is a working member of our bank, had been in fluent relationship with the Defendant that the Plaintiff would repay the loans and directly perform the registration affairs. On October 18, 2013, the Plaintiff repaid KRW 35.9 million to our bank. The Defendant separately classified the sales contract of the buyers who make the Plaintiff’s request. On October 15, 2013, when the sales contract of this case was omitted from the above classification, the Plaintiff transferred the sales contract of this case to the E judicial scrivener in charge of applying for registration of the establishment of a mortgage to convert the loan of intermediate payment into the loan against the loan of this case.

(A) At this time, E Certified Judicial Scrivenerss received a security management agreement on personal information. (D)

The Plaintiff returned the instant sales contract around October 23, 2013, and the Defendant affixed the rubber and seal to the E-certified judicial scrivener’s office, and the seal of approval from the head of the competent Gu.

arrow