Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 6,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is engaged in driving CSM 7 automobiles.

On February 26, 2014, at around 01:13, the Defendant continued two lanes of the Kimpo-ro, the Kimpo-ro located in the Gopo-si, Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, in the direction of strengthening the Seoul direction, at a speed of about 100 km.

In such cases, there was a duty of care to drive safely to ensure that a person engaged in driving of a vehicle does not interfere with the progress of another vehicle driving.

Nevertheless, the defendant is negligent in doing so and is proceeding.

In the same direction, the victim D (35 years of age, South) driven by the victim D (35 years of age, South) has contacted the front part of the left side of the Espke vehicle into the front part after the vehicle's right side.

As a result, the Defendant, by negligence in the course of business, inflicted injury upon the victim requiring medical treatment and stability between about three weeks due to salt, tension, etc. of the bones of wood, and escaped without taking necessary measures, such as destroying property equivalent to KRW 2,062,980 on the repair dog of damaged vehicles, and aiding the victim at the site.

Summary of Evidence

1. Witness D's testimony;

1. Reports on traffic accidents, and reports on the occurrence of traffic accidents;

1. Accident site and vehicle photograph;

1. A medical certificate;

1. Written estimate;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes, such as criminal records;

1. Article 5-3 (1) 2 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 148 and 54 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the crime;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The defendant's assertion and defense counsel's defense of the provisional payment order under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act and the judgment of the defendant and defense counsel did not cause a traffic accident in the judgment, and even if a domestic traffic accident occurred, the defendant is aware of the fact that the accident occurred.