logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2021.01.14 2020고정1897
전자금융거래법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of four million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

No one shall lend any access medium while receiving, demanding or promising to receive compensation in using or managing access medium used in electronic financial transactions.

Nevertheless, on December 1, 2019, the Defendant received a proposal from the scam scam scam scam scamer who misrepresented the employees of the lending company and consented to the lending of KRW 10 million from the scam scam scam scam scam scam scam that is linked to the Defendant’s account in the name of the Defendant at the Defendant’s office located in Nam-gu Incheon Nam-gu, Incheon, through Kwikkset’s service articles, and delivered each of the above scam scam scam scamscams (C) connected to the Saemaul Bank’s account (D) and one connected to the Defendant’s account.

Accordingly, the Defendant promised to receive the intangible benefit of the implementation of the loan and lent the approaching medium.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. A written petition;

1. An application for bank transactions;

1. Investigation report (to attach information on the account title A to the account holder of the deposited amount of damage);

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing free admission and withdrawal;

1. Article 49(4)2 and Article 6(3)2 of the former Electronic Financial Transactions Act (amended by Act No. 17297 of May 19, 2020) on criminal facts

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The crime of violating the Electronic Financial Transactions Act, such as the instant case, on the grounds of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order, is highly adverse to society by not only undermining the credibility of the safety performance of electronic financial transactions, but also undermining the credibility of the safety performance of electronic financial transactions, and by abusing the leased access media to various illegal acts, such as financial fraud.

In fact, the access media that the defendant lent was used to commit financial fraud.

However, the defendant.

arrow