The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The lower court’s sentence (2,00,000 won of fine) against the Defendant as to the summary of the grounds for appeal is too unhued and unreasonable.

2. The crime of this case is deemed to require strict punishment against the defendant in light of the fact that the defendant intrudes upon his residence for the purpose of theft of another person's property or theft of another person's property, and that the crime of this case was committed several times due to the same crime, that the defendant was punished several times due to the same crime, that he committed the crime of this case without being aware of himself during the repeated crime period due to the same crime, and that the victim C's damage was not recovered. However, the defendant confessions all of the crime of this case, and the defendant seems to have an opportunity to sufficiently reflect his life through confinement over three months at the court below. The victim Eul is a relatively small amount of damage, and the victim Eul is a relatively small amount of damage, and the victim Eul is placed in a preference to the defendant, the victim Eul is seeking a proper sentence against the defendant, the defendant's life in his mother and was unable to receive proper education, etc. from his mother, and the defendant's family relation relation was born to him, and the defendant did not have sufficient reasons to obtain the defendant's living standard of unfair sentencing.

3. If so, the prosecutor's appeal is without merit and Article 364 of the Criminal Procedure Act.