The defendant is innocent.

The summary of the facts charged in this case is that the employee of the defendant violated the restriction on the operation of the vehicle of the road management agency on May 11, 2004 on the road prior to the office of the office of the office of the road management.

In this regard, the Constitutional Court's decision of unconstitutionality (Supreme Court Decision 2010Hun-Ga14, 15, 21, 27, 35, 38, 44, 70 (merger) applied to the above facts charged was retroactively invalidated.

Thus, the facts charged of this case constitute a case that does not constitute a crime, and thus, is acquitted pursuant to the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.