The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The summary of the facts charged is the employee of the Victim C (Inn, 23 years of age). On April 17, 2013, the Defendant: (a) around 19:00, around 19:0, sent the victim a meeting to distinguish from each other; and (b) divided the first and second small-lane 6 diseases to the victim at a cafeteria located in Yangcheon-gu Seoul, Yangcheon-gu, Seoul; and (c) was able to rape the victim by having the breath while moving the bread victim to his/her vehicle to the house.

At around 22:00 on the same day, the Defendant “Furel” located in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, “Furel” to the victim “,” and had had the beer and the beer, and induced the victim believed to do so within the telecom.

Since then, the Defendant: (a) was drunkly drunked by the victim’s her spanty and panty spanty; (b) took her clothes on the chest, she was frightened with the left chest; and (c) attempted to she was frighten and rape three times on the part of the other victim’s sound on the part of the vessel; (d) however, she attempted to she was frighten with the wind of the victim, she was frighten, frighten, and frighted by the victim.

2. The facts charged above are the crimes falling under Articles 300, 299, and 297 of the former Criminal Act (amended by Act No. 11574, Dec. 18, 2012; hereinafter the same) and can be prosecuted only upon a victim’s complaint under Article 2 of the Addenda to the Criminal Act (amended by Act No. 11574, Dec. 18, 2012); and Article 306 of the former Criminal Act.

However, according to the records, the victim can recognize the fact of revoking the complaint against the defendant on October 21, 2013, which was after the public prosecution of this case was instituted. Thus, the public prosecution of this case is dismissed pursuant to Article 327 subparagraph 5 of the Criminal Procedure Act.