1. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.

(a) The indication of the attached Form(s) among the area of 561m2 in Busan Gangseo-gu Busan Metropolitan City C 561m2;

(a).(b).

1. Determination on the cause of the claim

A. 1) On July 20, 2007, the Plaintiff is deemed to be the Plaintiff’s land in this case for the creation and operation of a flower complex, etc. from the Busan Urban Transit Authority, and the Plaintiff is deemed to be the Plaintiff’s land in this case.

2) Around that time, the Plaintiff leased the instant land on the following grounds: (a) Busan Gangseo-gu, Busan Gangseo-gu, and 26 parcels for the purpose of establishing a plastic greenhouse for the purpose of original art; (b) the lease period shall be three years; and (c) the lease period shall be extended only once (2) years, except in extenuating circumstances; and (d) the Plaintiff

(a).

(c).

(f) a.

In line with each point, two plastic greenhouses for broom-friendly 218, 219, and 210 square meters on the ground connected in the ship, were installed as well as two plastic greenhouses for the purpose of wedding of the broom broom, vinyl, vinyl, or vinyl, (hereinafter “the instant plastic greenhouse”).

After the Plaintiff leased the entire project site including the instant land, each of the promoters invested in the civil engineering construction cost of each of the instant land, thereby creating a flower complex and managing shares in proportion to their investments. On August 13, 2010, the lessee of the premise site, including the instant land, changed to F under a lease agreement between the Busan Traffic Corporation and the Busan Traffic Corporation, but the Plaintiff currently held 8.078% of the shares of F Co., Ltd. in relation to the instant plastic land site. According to the results of the fact-finding on F Co., Ltd., the Plaintiff clearly stated that F Co., Ltd. is an individual shareholder and the owner of the instant plastic house is the Plaintiff.

2) On August 20, 2008, the Plaintiff leased the instant land to Nonparty E by setting the lease period of three years, and leased the instant vinyl. 3) However, from September 3, 2010 to September 3, 2010, the Defendant leased the instant land and the instant vinyl houses from E without the Plaintiff’s consent or consent.