logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2016.01.21 2015고단1687
과실치상
Text

A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant is a person who resides in No. 103 of the studio B in Jeonju-si and the victim C(48 tax) is a person who resides in No. 203 of the above floor and resides in the same studio.

Around 01:00 on June 20, 2015, the Defendant opened a 203 door, which is the victim’s residence, and talked with the victim, and then closed the gate. At that time, the Defendant was at the time, and the right hand hand hand hand hand of the victim’s right door was located in the gate, so the Defendant was likely to put the victim’s right hand in the gate, and thus, the Defendant was negligent in neglecting the gate, despite his duty of care not to put the victim’s right hand on the gate, and caused the victim to wear the part of the gate, 3, 4, 4, and 4 of the gate part of the gate.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Some statements made against the defendant during the police interrogation protocol;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. A complaint, a medical certificate and a medical certificate;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation (related to confirmation of a medical certificate);

1. Article 266 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Article 266 of the choice of punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. It is recognized that the degree of injury of the victim for the reason of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is more severe, the damage of the victim is not recovered, the defendant has been punished several times due to the crime of violating traffic laws on roads. However, even though the defendant is recognized to commit the crime of this case, the fact that the defendant repents the mistake while recognizing the crime of this case, the fault of the victim also functions as the cause of the victim's injury, and the defendant is the defendant.

arrow