The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence imposed by the court below (four months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The lower court sentenced the Defendant to four months of imprisonment, taking into account the circumstances unfavorable to the Defendant and favorable to the Defendant.

In full view of the facts that are conditions for sentencing in the trial of the political party, in particular, there is no circumstance that the sentencing of the court below is deemed to have exceeded the reasonable bounds of discretion, or that it is unreasonable to maintain the sentencing of the court below, in view of the following: (a) the fact that the victim female intrudes into the residence of the married female and larceny; and (b) the fact that the defendant is a repeated offender; and (c) the fact that the defendant is the repeated offender; and (d) the sentencing guidelines,

In addition, considering the circumstances and results of the crime of this case, the sentence of the court below is proper, and it is not recognized that it is unfair because it is too unreasonable, considering the circumstances after the crime of this case.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the conclusion is groundless.