The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Punishment of the crime

A food service business operator shall not provide alcoholic beverages to juveniles, and shall confirm the age when he/she provides alcoholic beverages.

Nevertheless, around 23:00 on April 25, 2014, the Defendant sold an amount equivalent to KRW 47,000,000, such as So-ju 2 disease and Kimchi Gung-ju, to two juveniles, from the main point of “D” in the Defendant’s operation of the Defendant in Gwangju Mine-gu, Gwangju.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. E statements;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the investigation report (Attachment of receipt);

1. Article 59 of the relevant Act on Criminal facts and Articles 59 subparagraph 6 and 28 (1) of the Protection of Juveniles Eligible for the Selection of Punishment;

1. Penalty fine of 500,000 won to be suspended;

1. Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act (100,000 won a day);

1. The crime of this case on the grounds of sentencing under Article 59(1) of the Criminal Code of the Suspension of Sentence is one of the main points in which the defendant was operated and undermining his sound growth. The crime of this case is not that of the Juvenile Protection Act to protect juveniles from various harmful environments, including harmful acts to juveniles so that juveniles can grow into the person of sound character.

However, on the other hand, it was confirmed that the defendant's mistake was divided and reflected, that the defendant was the first offender with no criminal records, that the defendant was a minor before the crime of this case, and that the defendant was the majority by demanding him to present his identification card to the F et al. (the F at that time seems to have presented his identification card), and that the above E et al., which was combined with F et al. on the above main points, failed to separately verify his identification card, and there are circumstances that may be taken into account in the circumstances leading to the crime of this case, and that the defendant's obligation to pay 40 million won to the defendant at present, etc. is hard to economicly.