logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 동부지원 2018.09.05 2018고정254
사기
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] On April 13, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for larceny in the branch court of the Busan District Court. The judgment became final and conclusive on July 29, 2017.

[Criminal facts]

1. The Defendant’s fraud against the Victim G is a person who resided in the Plaintiff’s room room 302, Suwon-gu, Busan, and is a neighboring relationship with the Victim G residing in the above room 101.

The defendant found at the victim's house around October 20, 2014, and tried to gather electricity from the victim.

“A false statement,” but the fact was not only thought to be used individually for the owner of the house under the pretext of electricity, but also for about 10 months after completing a prison life on October 3, 2014, and there was no other special occupation and there was no ability to repay it.

The Defendant, as well as the defrauded by receiving 50,000 won in cash from the damaged party, received 7,10,000 won in total from the damaged party from January 30, 2016 to the damaged party, from that time as shown in the list of crimes.

2. The criminal defendant against the victim I is a person who operates a mobile phone sales store in the name of "K" in Busan-gu J and the second floor.

The Defendant, around June 12, 2015, purchased a mobile phone auxiliary tape from China and divided the profits remaining by selling it to the mobile phone store. The Defendant, at the above “K” around June 12, 2015, purchased money from the victim I.

“The purpose of “ was to make a false statement.”

However, at the time of Busan's Japan, the Defendant purchased and sold part of the auxiliary ship, etc. or purchased and repaired and sold a mobile phone through the Internet "China" website, and there was no idea to purchase a mobile phone auxiliary ship in China. In addition, the Defendant did not make profits even from the sales of the aforementioned mobile phone at the time, and did not operate the aforementioned mobile phone sales store properly.

arrow