Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 500,000.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is Kwikset service engineer.

On November 30, 2018, at around 12:30, the Defendant 123, as the annual movement system in Busan City, and around the 3rd parallel with the previous crosswalk, she immediately stopped from the opposite line in the direction opposite to the opposite line in the direction opposite to the 3rd parallel of the 3rd parallel. On the ground that the victim B ( South, 49 years of age) gets on and off the urbane, and stopped the urgic on one occasion on the ground that he stopped the urgic, the Defendant she expressed the desire to “this dogget, Chewing flasium,” and assaulted the urgic with the purgic body at hand.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. B Legal statement;

1. Application of voice file CD-related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The portion not guilty under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

1. The summary of the facts charged charged, as indicated in the facts constituting the crime in the judgment, the Defendant assaulted the victim and inflicted an injury on the victim, such as salt chills, tensions, etc. for about three weeks of treatment.

2. In full view of the following facts and circumstances revealed by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this court, it cannot be deemed that the victim suffered injury, such as the Defendant’s assault, as stated in the facts charged, without reasonable doubt.

① The Defendant consistently denies the Defendant’s act of assaulting against the victim during the investigation process to the extent that it was true or did not contact the victim’s body. As evidence consistent with the facts charged in the instant case, the victim’s investigative procedure and the statement in this court may be used as evidence consistent with the facts charged in this case.

However, on the day of the police investigation, the victim stated that "the defendant assaulted his right shoulder and chest to the right side of his own by drinking for about five times" on the day of the instant investigation, and in this court, the victim stated in this court.