logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2018.10.30 2018고단5322
공무집행방해등
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment for eight months, for six months, for six months, and for eight months, for each of the defendants C.

except that this shall not apply.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On September 3, 2018, Defendant C- interference with the performance of duties, and the Defendant of assaulted the victim H’s “I” restaurant operated by the victim H located in G with the wife population at G on September 17:23, 2018, following the victim’s speech that “the victim who smoked tobacco in the restaurant would cause smoking in the restaurant,” and the victim demanded that “the victim read the smoking table on the table outside the restaurant.”

Although the Defendant told the victim that “I cannot drink any other alcoholic beverage than the current ones,” the Defendant 10,000 won, “I will drink outside,” and “I will drink outside,” and received KRW 100,000 from the injured party upon the Defendant’s request that “I will go to another place,” and went to the above restaurant. However, I would like to go to go to the front of the table that I am to the above restaurant, and I am to the end, on the ground that I am to the front of the table that I am to the front of the table that I am to the above restaurant, and am to the lower end on the table on the ground that I am to the end.

Defendant continued to be the head of the above restaurant, “Isle at the funeral hall” from the Victim J(47 tax) Department, the head of the above restaurant.

“” He listened to the horses, and she took part in the arms and neck of the victim by her hand.

As above, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s restaurant business operation and assaulted the victim’sJ by force by allowing approximately 30 minutes of the disturbance among the 30 minutes in the restaurant and preventing other customers from entering the restaurant.

2. Defendants - around September 17:42, 2018: (a) around 17:42; and (b) around September 17, 2018, the Defendants received a demand from L and M, a police officer affiliated with the police box of the Yongsan-dong Police Station, which called “a request for notification of personal information” from L and M, a police officer assigned to the police box of the Yongsan-dong Police Station, called “a request for notification of personal information” and confirmed that Defendant C had been assigned several times due to the default of fines.

Defendant

C is assigned to a case nominated due to the default of a fine.

arrow