logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2017.12.21 2017고정1734
사기
Text

The sentence against the accused shall be determined by a fine of KRW 1,00,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

From August 26, 2013, the Defendant is an intention to operate “C Council member” on the North-gu B and the third floor of Gwangjubuk-gu.

In attached Table 2 of Article 9 (1) of the Regulations on the Standards for Payment of National Health Insurance Benefits, the fact that it is conducted in cases where there is no problem in business or daily life, or that it is not possible to claim medical care benefits for non-benefit.

Nevertheless, on December 31, 2014, the Defendant received KRW 2,307,740,00 from September 1, 2014 to May 12, 2015, a total of KRW 130 in the method of double claiming care benefits after treating non-paid persons, including the payment of KRW 12,890, as shown in the attached Table of Crimes, when he/she filed a claim for medical care benefits as if he/she provided annual tissue salt treatment with the National Health Insurance Corporation on January 12, 2015.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. A written statement;

1. A ledger for illegal receipt of 130 injury and disease, and receipt;

1. Statement on expenses for medical care benefits;

1. Responses to a request for data (Health Insurance Review Evaluation Institute);

1. Application of investigation reports (Attachment, such as table for medical treatment, etc.), skin care Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 347 of the Criminal Act and Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act and the choice of fines for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is based on the following factors: (a) the sentencing conditions in the instant case, including the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, environment, the background and result of the instant crime; and (b) the circumstances after the instant crime, etc., the sentence is determined as ordered.

A favorable normal situation: The defendant has been divided into and reflected in his mistake.

The defendant does not commit a second offense.

arrow