1. The Defendants, the Defendant (Appointed Party), and the designated parties listed in the attached Table 3 Table 1 are:

A. Attached Form 1 of Annex 2 to the Plaintiff A.

Basic Facts

The co-owners, etc. of the instant officetels of the Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government building G large scale 370 square meters of the instant officetel form the “G reconstruction association” (the purpose of the instant officetel construction is to construct an officetel which is not a house, and there is no authorization for establishment of a reconstruction association as prescribed by the Act on the Maintenance and Improvement of Urban Areas and Dwelling Conditions for Residents) to remove existing buildings and construct an officetel on the said site, and the said reconstruction association (representative H) entered into a reconstruction project agreement with the J Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “J”) operated by Defendant I on May 28, 2003.

The main contents of this study are that J constructed an officetel with only the prescribed contributions from the above members necessary for the implementation of the project, as the implementer of the above reconstruction project, and then sell the general portion except the portion of the ownership to the above members on behalf of the above members and appropriate it for the construction cost, etc.

Co-owners, etc. of 1,038 square meters in Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government form a reconstruction association "K reconstruction association" (which does not obtain authorization for establishment of a reconstruction association as prescribed by the Act on the Maintenance and Improvement of Urban Areas and Dwelling Conditions for Residents; hereinafter the same shall apply) in order to remove existing buildings in the above site and reconstruct officetels. The reconstruction association (representative L) entered into a reconstruction project agreement with J on June 16, 2003 with the same contents as the above G reconstruction association entered into.

J on June 17, 2003, the owner of the building and 47 other than Defendant L L, and the owner of the building and k and 4 other four lots (the above M, N, G, andO land) of Mapo-gu Seoul and the officetel (hereinafter referred to as the “instant officetel”). The head of Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government permitted this on June 28, 2003.

The above building permit was issued on September 9, 2005 by the owner of the building, Defendant L and 45 (P and Q were excluded from the owner of the building) and the site Seoul.