1. Of the judgment of the first instance, as to Defendant D, KRW 11,855,718 against Plaintiff A and its related thereto from February 27, 2018 to September 10, 2020.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance citing the judgment is stated, and the judgment of the court of first instance 2-B.

The part of the claim against Defendant D, other than the following, is cited by the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance, and thus, this part is cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

【Supplementary Use】

B. According to the facts of recognition of liability for damages arising from nonperformance of obligation, Defendant D is liable for damages arising from nonperformance of obligation to Plaintiff A, barring special circumstances. Defendant D is not liable for damages arising from nonperformance of obligation, barring special circumstances. Defendant D’s assertion that the instant undertaking becomes null and void as the Plaintiff A’s appointment as the head of the Planning Group is not accepted. 2) The instant undertaking clause 1 of this case’s term “A shall be appointed to the Secretary General of the Organization, and work shall be free,” and the term “A shall not be removed or removed from office because it goes against the intention, and it shall be determined to pay the advance payment for six months at the time of violation and to compensate for losses arising therefrom,” and the meaning of advance payment for six months has not been determined in writing between Plaintiff A and Defendant D’s terms and conditions, and it is not clearly disputed between the two parties to the contract and Defendant D’s terms and conditions.