beta
Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.
If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[Criminal Power] On August 31, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to eight months of imprisonment for fraud at the Seosan Branch of the Daejeon District Court, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on February 27, 2013.
【Criminal Facts】
1. In light of the fact that the Defendant, as a broker assistant of the office of a licensed real estate agent, was authorized to conclude a monthly rent contract for D apartment 107 dong 1301 (hereinafter “ apartment”) at the time of Jinjin-si, the Defendant was willing to enter into a lease contract with another person without the consent of C to use the lease contract for the acquisition of the right to sell the apartment as the security deposit for lease on a deposit basis.
Accordingly, on May 24, 2009, the Defendant entered into a lease contract with G to enter into a lease contract with G, and entered into a lease contract with G around May 24, 2009;
1. Indication of real estate: D Apartment-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, 107 Dong 1301;
2. Terms and Conditions of Contract: The deposit shall be paid on June 1, 2009, the deposit shall be 0 million won, the down payment shall be 0 million won (payment and receipt shall be made at the time of the contract) and the balance shall be paid in full.
From June 1, 2009 to June 30, 2010, the lessor stated the lessor’s address H, resident number I, telephone J, and name C, and affix C’s seal prior custody in C. For the purpose of exercising rights and obligations, the Defendant forged one copy of the lease contract under C, a private document related to rights and obligations, in the name of C. On June 1, 2009, the Defendant used the forged lease contract under the name of C, which is a document related to rights and obligations. On June 1, 2009, the Defendant, at the same time and place as indicated in paragraph (1), and at the same time and place as mentioned in paragraph (1), and at the same time and place, as seen above, the defrauded used the forged lease contract as if he were duly formed.
However, the above apartment was owned by the above C.