logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2013.07.09 2013고정923
절도등
Text

The sentence against the accused shall be determined by a fine of KRW 1,00,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2013 Highly 923] The Defendant married with the victim B and divorced as of June 5, 2012 while residing in Songpa-gu Seoul and 302. The Defendant and the victim resided in the above residence until August 10, 2012, and the victim thereafter entered the above residence.

On May 2012, the Defendant, at the end of the same residence, destroyed and damaged the goods owned by the victims of the market price, such as several clothes, several shoes, cremation, one cremation, one strip North Korean street, one e-mail, one air-condition, one electronic rail, one dried, one crum, one crum, one crum, and one gate, etc.

Although the Defendant alleged that he did not take the goods owned by the Defendant as the owner of others and did not take the goods to B, even though he did not take them, the Defendant’s act of dumping the goods owned by B without the consent of B is clear that the goods are B, and even if he did not have the obligation to take them out of the above residence, it is clear that the Defendant’s act of dumping the goods owned by B without the consent of B constitutes a crime of destroying and damaging property.

[2013 High Court Decision 924]

1. On February 20, 2013, at around 10:42, the Defendant invadedd another person’s residence against the victim’s will, by going through a talking with the F, which is the mother of the victim’s parent, on the second floor of the residence of the victim E (18 years of age, in Songpa-gu) located in Songpa-gu Seoul, and going beyond the gate and going to the second floor and going to the second floor and going to the second floor and going to the second floor and going to the second floor of the gate, etc.

2. The Defendant damaged the property by destroying the property of the victim under the market price by shouldering one copy of the victim F’s front door glass (a.e., 90cm in length, 110cm in length) from the time, at the same time and place as the above paragraph 1, on the ground that the above E does not open the door.

b)a summary of the evidence;

arrow