logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2016.12.14 2016고단2074
사기
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment for three years.

Defendant

G is not guilty. The summary of the judgment of innocence against Defendant G is publicly notified.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant A was sentenced to six months of imprisonment for a crime of fraud at the Daejeon District Court on February 19, 2010, and the judgment was finalized on October 28, 201, and on March 22, 2012, the same court was sentenced to two years of suspension of execution for four months of imprisonment for an unlawful uttering of official documents. The judgment became final and conclusive on June 22, 2012.

Criminal facts

[2016 Highest 2074]

1. Defendant A is a person who has been operating (ju)C that sells steel products.

Defendant

A around 15:00 on February 9, 200, at the Ma Attorney-at-law office located in Dongnam-gu, Dongnam-gu, Incheon, and on February 18, 2009, the fact that the victim N was introduced from G does not own steel products to the victim, and does not have the ability to be supplied at any other place, and makes a false statement that "to supply steel 520 tons to 400 million won," and on February 16, 2009, the above victim called "to send products if 100 million won, first of all, if sent 100 million won in advance," and then he then transferred 10 million won from the victim to the account in the name of Han Bank (O) at that time. On February 18, 2009, he received 500 tons of steel products from the victim, and received 60 million won in advance money from the victim, and then transferred the entire amount to the victim by deceiving 60 million won."

2. On February 10, 2009, Defendant A made a false statement to the (main) C office located in Daejeon Seo-gu Daejeon U.S., and Defendant A made a statement to the injured party that, even if the injured party received the price from the injured party, Defendant A did not have the ability to normally supply steel products at a price lower than the agency, that Defendant A would supply the sn beam at a price lower than the agency’s sn beam and supply the sn beam at the sn beam of the transported vehicle and the sn beam at the sn beam at the snive of the transport vehicle’s cost and at the snive of the goods.

arrow