1. The Defendant Korea Land and Housing Corporation shall:

A. Attached Form

3. The “subject real estate” in the list of real estate refers to each description.

1. Basic facts

A. The parties 1) The Plaintiff is the Gunsan City, X-si and 2 lots (hereinafter “instant improvement zone”).

(2) The re-building project of this case (hereinafter referred to as the "re-building project of this case")

The Act on the Maintenance and Improvement of Urban Areas and Dwelling Conditions for Residents (hereinafter referred to as the “Urban Improvement Act”) shall apply.

(2) According to the reasoning of the judgment below, on October 19, 2012, the Defendants (including D) and the designated parties W are currently located in the rearrangement zone in the present case, with the authorization of establishment from the Gunsan City of Jeollabuk-do on October 19, 2012 and the registration of establishment of the association was completed on October 25, 2012.

4. Each Defendant’s real estate listed in the list of real estate (hereinafter “each corresponding real estate of this case”) shall be “each corresponding real estate of this case,” and each individual real estate of this case shall be indicated in the same manner as

4. Where it is necessary to specify each real estate listed in the list of real estate in detail, the phrase “the instant claim real estate” is indicated by the sequences.

(3) The deceased C, an individual owner of the instant Claim 21, who was the owner of the instant real estate, died during the instant lawsuit, and D, a litigation acceptance agent of the Defendant deceased D (hereinafter referred to as “Defendant D”), was simply indicated as Defendant D, on March 22, 2016, completed the registration of ownership transfer on the instant Claim 21 due to inheritance by agreement division as of September 9, 2014, and taken over the instant litigation procedure.

On March 29, 2016, Defendant D completed the registration of ownership transfer on the ground of the gift made on March 28, 2016 to AE on the instant paragraph 21 of this case.

However, the Plaintiff, on September 17, 2013, received a provisional injunction against the disposal of real estate in relation to Article 21 of the instant case from the competent court (2013Kahap257, Sept. 17, 2013), and completed the registration of the entry. Therefore, the disposition against AE, which was subsequently made, cannot be asserted as effective against the Plaintiff against the purport of the provisional injunction against the disposal

The action of the network C or the network C below.