A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On November 16, 2012, he/she was indicted after being investigated by police officers I, etc. in charge of the police station in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Police Station, and was sentenced to two years and six months of imprisonment at the same appellate court on February 6, 2013.

On July 23, 2015, the Defendant: (a) filed a complaint with the Seoul Northern District Prosecutors’ Office to the effect that the investigation into a crime constitutes a waiver of duty; (b) on July 28, 2015, the Defendant filed a complaint with the Seoul Northern District Prosecutors’ Office to the effect that the investigation into a crime constitutes a waiver of duty; and (c) on October 21, 2015, the Defendant again filed a complaint with the same prosecutors’ office to the effect that the crime list prepared by the said I, etc. in relation to the fact of damage to GIST, etc. constituted a preparation of false official document, the amount of damage caused by which is uneased, and then dismissed on April 21, 2016.

2. Around May 25, 2016, the Defendant drafted a false accusation against G at his own house of Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government J apartment, 104 Dong 1301, and by using computers.

However, G provided a bribe to the police and conducted an investigation by unfolding the amount equivalent to KRW 92,90,000,000, while the amount of actual damage to G E is about KRW 19,000,000. As such, G through thorough investigation by giving bribes, etc., G is subject to strict punishment.

On August 25, 2016, the Defendant stated to the effect that “The Defendant provided a bribe to the police officer of the Seoul Eastern Police Station K Team I and recovered the amount of damage,” even in the time of a supplementary investigation conducted by the Seoul Northern District Public Prosecutor’s Office (hereinafter “Seoul Northern District Public Prosecutor’s Office”).

However, in fact, the amount of damage of G in the case of fraud of Seoul Northern District Court 2012 High Order 2521 High Order 2521 against E is the statement of damage of G and E.