(영문) 의정부지방법원 2021.01.19 2019가단123809

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 의정부지방법원 2021.01.19 2019가단123809

건물명도(인도)

Text

1. The defendant shall receive KRW 17,960,00 from the plaintiff and at the same time shall be attached to the first floor of the building as stated in the attached Table from the plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On June 15, 2010, the Plaintiff and the Defendant set up a store as set forth in paragraph (1) of the disposition of the Plaintiff’s ownership (hereinafter “instant store”).

From July 6, 2010 to July 5, 2015, a lease contract was concluded with a deposit amount of KRW 25,000,000 and a tea amount of KRW 2,00,000 each month.

around that time, the Defendant paid the above lease deposit to the Plaintiff and operated the restaurant with the delivery of the instant store.

On April 14, 2011, the Plaintiff and the Defendant rendered a lawsuit telephone (Seoul Northern District Court 2010, 150 building names, etc.) with the same terms and conditions as the above lease agreement. (B) After the expiration of the above lease agreement, the Plaintiff and the Defendant renewed it, but changed the lease period to KRW 3,100,00 per month, and the deposit amount to April 18, 2017 shall be changed to KRW 3,200 per month, and the rent shall be changed to KRW 3,20,000 per month, and the lease contract shall be concluded again three months prior to the expiration of the lease term, and if the lessee fails to renew the lease contract three months prior to the expiration of the lease term, it shall be deemed that the lease contract is terminated upon the expiration of the lease term (Article 7). The lessee shall claim reimbursement of expenses (non-profit expenses), waiver of the lease contract, and demand for all of the lessor (Article 9, etc.).

AB concluded the agreement.

(c)

The Plaintiff was the Defendant on February 22, 2019, “The maturity date of the instant lease agreement renewed on April 17, 2017 is July 6, 2019.

The plaintiff is underground in which he did not intend to renew the lease contract at the maturity of the above lease contract, and it is possible to restore the store of this case to its original state by the maturity date of the lease contract and return it to the plaintiff, and immediately settle public charges, etc. and return the lease deposit to the plaintiff.

“Notice” was given to the Defendant at that time, and that notice was given to the Defendant.

유사 판례

-의정부지방법원 2021.01.19 2019가단123809

-서울동부지방법원 2021.04.22 2019가단107129

-서울서부지방법원 2015.11.25 2014가단50046

-전주지방법원남원지원 2019.04.03 2018가단1651

-서울남부지방법원 2018.06.29 2018가단201232