logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2015.01.15 2014누4087
정부출연금 환수처분등 취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court’s explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance, except for the addition or modification of a part of the judgment of the first instance as set forth in the following paragraph (2). Thus, this is acceptable as it is in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. A portion used for adding or cutting;

(a) under paragraph 2 below the third page the second letter "Fence of March 201" shall read "Fence of October 27, 201".

B. Parts 7 through 16 of the 7th century were conducted as follows. 3) The Plaintiff produced a revolving test engine (1) from November 201 to January 201, 201, and entered into the instant agreement on the basis of the results of a re-testing test for the development accelerating (10 mpm). On March 10, 2011, the period of production of the re-testing test engine was 10 to 16th (3th mp: 10th mp) to the Small and Medium Business Administration, and the Plaintiff was 10 to 3th mp-type 10 to 10th mp-type 10 to 10th mp-type 16th mp-type 10 to 10th mp-2, 201, and then requested the Defendant to change the mp-type 10 to mp-type 10th mp-2, 2011 to 3th m 10.

(c) “Performance” in the part “3. precision” in the part “1arc mination: 3.e.,” 2arc mination: 3.ea in the part “3.”

Following the 9th page, each of the evidence Nos. 13 and 14 of the Act shall be 1.

arrow