(B) No. 1-A, 1-C, the decision of the court below, 1-C, 1-2, 1-2, 1-2, 1-2

As to the crime No. 2 of the holding.

Punishment of the crime

On August 29, 2008, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of six months for a violation of the Game Industry Promotion Act at the Seoul Southern District Court, and the judgment was finalized around that time. On June 26, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment of one year and ten months for the charge of forging official documents at the Seoul East District Court, and the judgment became final and conclusive on July 4, 2015.

1. 2015 high group 1618;

A. On January 15, 2008, the Defendant: (a) at the victim D’s house located in Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government C and 125 Dong 301 on January 15, 2008, the Defendant paid off the amount by dividing the amount of money that he/she would have obtained with the retired police officer by dividing the amount of money that he/she would have obtained.

As the retired police officers operate together with other police officers, they made a false statement to the effect that they are able to pay a lot of money and are unlikely to pay money.”

However, in fact, the Defendant had already been liable to pay the victim the above amount of 21 million won or more, so even if he borrowed the above amount from the victim, he did not have any intention or ability to pay it.

The Defendant, as such, deceiving the victim, and 1 million won for the purpose of purchasing entertainment equipment on the same day from the damaged party, and 2 million won for the same purpose on the 31st of the same month;

2. 25. The same name was remitted 4 million won to an account in the name of the accused respectively;

2) On March 31, 2008, at the victim D’s house located in Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government and 125 dong 301, the Defendant: (a) “The victim was engaged in the entertainment room business, while the control group of the illegal entertainment room was on the part of the victim, and seized all the equipment of the entertainment room.

Now, it does not operate illegally and does not request a license to lend money only once again. The money is to operate a entertainment room, and it is to be repaid at a time up to seven million won from the loan to the purchase price of the machinery of the entertainment room at the last time as profit is generated.

The phrase “ makes a false statement.”

However, the defendant did not think that he borrowed money from the injured party and used it to operate the entertainment room.