logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2018.09.06 2018고단3310
강제추행
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant and the victim B (the age of 25) were aware of each other while entering the Ethston club in around 2012. On May 31, 2018, the Defendant start driving the Defendant’s Ethmp vehicle in front of the “D cafeteria” located in Liber Group C around 00:50 on May 31, 2018, and immediately start driving the vehicle on the Ethmp vehicle of the Defendant who was parked in front of the “D cafeteria,” and immediately set the vehicle, and then, the Defendant’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s face was forced to return the son’s face, and laid it into the victim’s entrance.

As a result, the Defendant committed an indecent act against the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to B;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a statement of investigation reports (records at the time of the first 112 declaration of victim B)-12;

1. Relevant Article 298 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Social service businesses under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 16 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes Committed to attend a lecture;

1. There are special circumstances in which disclosure of personal information may not be disclosed in light of the Defendant’s age, occupation, risk of recidivism, type and motive of the sexual assault crime of this case, crime process, disclosure order or notification order, expected side effects and side effects of the Defendant’s disadvantage due to the Defendant’s exemption from disclosure order and notification order, prevention of sex crimes that may be achieved due to such order, protection of victims, etc.

As such, an order to disclose or notify the accused is not issued pursuant to Articles 47(1) and 49(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes, and the proviso to Article 49(1) and the proviso to Article 50(1) of the Act on the Protection of Children against Sexual Abuse.

1. The proviso to Article 56 (1) of the Act on the Protection of Juveniles against Sexual Abuse (which does not have the same kind of force and the risk of re-offending in light of the background of the crime, etc.).

arrow