A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. 도로 교통법위반( 음주 운전) 피고인은 2017. 5. 27. 05:30 경 서울 강남구 강남 역 10번 출구 앞 도로에서부터 같은 날 06:05 경 서울 영등포구 선유로 277 양화 대교 남단 부근 도로에 이르기까지 약 17km 구간에서 혈 중 알코올 농도 0.079% 의 술에 취한 상태로 D 포르테 쿱 승용차를 운전하였다.

2. On May 27, 2017, around 06:05, the Defendant: (a) was driving the said vehicle on the road near the Southern Transboundary; (b) was demanded from the Inspector F of the Seoul Yeongdeungpo-gu Police Station E-gu, Seoul, under the influence of drinking, to stop; (c) the Defendant continued to drive the said vehicle, which is a dangerous object, and (d) continued to drive the said vehicle to stop and stop the said vehicle; and (e) even though the police officer belonging to the same police station demanded the said patrol officer to stop the vehicle at the front of the said vehicle, the Defendant fell down with the right hand hand hand hand hand hand hand hand hand hand hand hand hand hand hand hand hand of the above vehicle, which is a dangerous object.

In this respect, the defendant, using a dangerous object, interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning the crackdown on drinking driving.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police in relation to G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a statement on the circumstances of the driver at the main place, a statement of opinion, a statement of alcohol during blood, and an investigation report (applicable with the aforementioned dmark);

1. Relevant Article of the Act and Articles 148-2 (2) 3 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act (the point of drinking alcohol), Articles 144 (1) and 136 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of special duties), and the selection of imprisonment for each sentence concerning the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act imposes restrictions upon the body of the traffic policemen by disregarding the police officers' restraint on driving in the reason of sentencing, and driving his/her vehicle as it is. During that process, it is obvious that a motor vehicle other than the traffic policemen will conflict with other motor vehicles.