A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On December 16, 2015, around 23:10 on December 23:16, 2015, the Defendant: (a) on the street in Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government; (b) on the street, the Defendant: (c) received a demand from a male passenger to a police officer belonging to the Mapo-gu Police Station Ear-gu, in receipt of a report, for getting off the said F’s face on the ground that he was prevented from getting in the said taxi; and (d) assaulted the Defendant by having his body pushed up once.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of the law of the police statement protocol to F;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

2. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1)(the following favorable circumstances) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution [the scope of recommendation] The basic area (fe.g., interference with the performance of official duties and coercion of official duties) (fe., June 1 to January 4) of Article 62 of the Criminal Act (fe.g., the decision of sentence] reflects the defendant's wrongness in depth, but the defendant has several records of past punishment and fines for the same kind of crime, taking into account the fact that there are several records of past punishment and fines.