logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2015.05.12 2015고단308
교통사고처리특례법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in the duty of driving a Cro-cab.

On October 14, 2014, the Defendant driven the above car on the 12:45 day of October 14, 2014, and led the two-lanes in front of the Doctrine, which is located in 643-6, Dobong-gu Seoul, Dobong-gu, Seoul, to proceed at a non-speed speed depending on the two-lanes of the Doctri apartment.

Since there is an intersection where a signal, etc. is installed, the defendant engaged in driving service has a duty of care to reduce the speed prior to entering the intersection and the right and the right and the right, and to drive safely in accordance with the signals.

Nevertheless, by neglecting this, the Defendant neglected to change the vehicle's progress signals to the stop signal, and due to the negligence of proceeding, the Defendant, from the right side of the vehicle driving to the left side of the victim D(54 years old) driving, who is straighted by the new code, was shocked by the front part of the Defendant's vehicle driving.

The Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as the left-hand lag, which requires approximately 12 weeks of medical treatment due to the above occupational negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Each traffic accident report;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) and Article 3 (1) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents According to the relevant criminal facts, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and the

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the order of provisional payment in violation of the traffic accident of this case and thereby causing serious injury to the victim. However, although the defendant recognized his mistake and reflects the victim, the defendant has no record of criminal punishment, the defendant's age, inclination, family relation, and circumstances after the crime, etc. are revealed in the arguments of this case.

arrow