logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2012.12.27 2012노3920
산지관리법위반
Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. Although the Defendant’s judgment on the Defendant’s assertion of unfair sentencing is taken into account the following factors: (a) the Defendant’s mistake is divided; and (b) the leased mountainous district has been restored; (c) the lower court appears to have already taken into account such favorable circumstances in sentencing; (d) there are no circumstances to reduce the amount of fine in the first instance trial; and (e) the Defendant has the power to commit the same kind of crime; (e) the amount and degree of the converted mountainous district; (b) the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, circumstances after the commission of the crime; and (c) the various sentencing conditions stated in the instant argument, including the circumstances after the crime

2. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow