Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal record] The defendant was sentenced to eight months of imprisonment with prison labor by interference with business affairs at the Jeju District Court on January 23, 2018 and submitted a written statement of the written appeal as to the judgment of the defendant on January 31, 2018 on January 24, 2018, but the prosecutor who is the other party did not waive the appeal. Thus, the judgment to be subject to the appeal period becomes final and conclusive.

The judgment became final and conclusive.

[2] On December 11, 2017, at around 15:30 on December 15, 2017, the Defendant: (a) within the D cafeteria operated by the victim C; and (b) within the D cafeteria operated by the victim and its customers, the Defendant: (c) obstructed the victim’s restaurant operation by putting the victim and its customers with a prudente for about 30 minutes, i.e., “C., e., chrone,” and b

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. C’s statement;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Application of a reply to inquiry, such as criminal history, (A);

1. Article 314 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. After Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Article 39 (1) of the same Act:

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The grounds for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act for the provisional payment order shall be determined as follows in consideration of the following circumstances.

D. Unfavorable circumstances: The degree of interference with duties is not very serious, and the victim does not want the punishment of the defendant, and the defendant recognizes and reflects the crime. Since the crime of this case is in the relation of obstruction of duties of the decision that was sentenced for eight months of imprisonment and the crime of this case's concurrent crimes after Article 37 of the Criminal Act, it is fair with the case's concurrent crimes. The defendant's age, environment, and circumstances after the crime is committed.