The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the lower court’s imprisonment (eight months of imprisonment, confiscation) is too unreasonable.

2. The following should be taken into account: (a) the Defendant made a confession and reflects all of the instant crimes; (b) the commission of the commission of the theft, the commission of the commission of the attempted crime, or the amount of damage, and (c) the victim D has not been punished by the Defendant.

However, the crime of this case was committed by the Defendant at night by destroying the door, etc. and impairing the structure, and the nature of the crime was poor, and the Defendant committed each of the crimes of this case at once during the grace period despite the fact that he committed each of the crimes of this case even though he was committed prior to the suspended sentence by committing the same kind of crime in the past, and considering the various circumstances that are the conditions for sentencing, such as the age and happiness environment of the Defendant, the lower court’s punishment is deemed appropriate, and thus, the Defendant’s assertion is rejected.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.