The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

The summary of the grounds for appeal (in fact-finding) of the defendant's false report was made by the victim D, who saw the victim to have his/her will toward the defendant, brought him/her back to his/her back, and later brought him/her back to his/her back, and there was no injury to the victim at all.

Judgment

In light of the following circumstances revealed through the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, it can be recognized that the defendant inflicted an injury on the victim with a heavy knife, etc., which the defendant argued with the victim as stated in the facts constituting the crime in the judgment below.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

The victim consistently stated from the investigative agency to the court of the court of the court below that "the defendant was under guard due to the defendant's report on deck, and the defendant was under guard, and the defendant was under guard with his own knife, etc., and later moved the defendant to the aft of the damaged ship."

B. From the investigative agency to the court of the court below, the E (captain) also testified consistently that “The Defendant was friendly with the victim by a knife and other tools, such as a knife and knife, and the victim’s head. Even after the victim’s movement to the knife, the Defendant took the knife and knife on the deck and taken it away from the knife,” thereby supporting the victim’s statement.

However, in the court of the court below, E stated that the crime attempted to be committed is a knife, not a knife, unlike the statements of the victim and other witnesses, but it is difficult to view it as a simple error, considering that there was a very confusion situation at the time.

(c) at an investigative agency, F.I.D., a crew member of the same level, directly witness the victim’s knife in the deck.” The statement (in the investigation record 11-12 pages) to support the victim’s statement.