logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2013.04.26 2012구합36613
해임처분취소
Text

1. The Defendant’s dismissal disposition against the Plaintiff on May 1, 2012 shall be revoked.

2. The costs of the lawsuit are assessed against the defendant.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. Since the Plaintiff was appointed as the Inspector on April 3, 1987, the Plaintiff is a police officer who was promoted to the Daegu Regional Police Agency (Seoul Regional Police Agency) and C from January 11, 2012, as of March 14, 1994; as of December 22, 200; as of December 31, 2009, respectively.

B. On January 14, 2012, the Inspection Division of the National Police Agency concluded that the Plaintiff’s receipt of KRW 900 million from D in relation to the Plaintiff’s duties as a result of an investigation to verify the Plaintiff’s suspicion, and that the Plaintiff cannot be aware of the Plaintiff’s receipt of KRW 900 million in relation to the Plaintiff’s duties, as the Plaintiff’s assertion, and that part of the Plaintiff’s loan and delivery of investment only were made (the Plaintiff was already subject to the internal approval of the special division of the Daegu District Public Prosecutor’s Office from August 2009 to January 201, 201. Since January 2012, the Plaintiff became aware of the relationship between the Plaintiff and E in the process of the investigation.

C. According to the aforementioned findings, the Defendant: (a) on April 20, 2012, to the Central Disciplinary Committee of Police Officers, the following Plaintiff:

1. From the office of the federation of merchants in Daegu GGG at around the end of the year 2010, in which E, the president of the federation of merchants, delivers to the Plaintiff, the amount of KRW 400,000 and KRW 1,00,000 in cash to the Plaintiff at a temporary and irregular place, and received KRW 2,00,000 from the above H on the ground that the said E’s “J amusement tavern” from the GG International Hotel in Daegu International Hotel around March 2010 is difficult, and received KRW 2,00,000 as the money as the money for the reason that the said E’s “in difficult convenience” was “3,000,000 won” from the said E, and received KRW 40,000,000,000,000 from the Plaintiff’s own account before and after the 2010 GG GG G G G G.

2.On August 201, when working as the Franchi Office F.

arrow