A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant was engaged in business embezzlement by July 2009 as an employee of an industrial bank, such as deposit and withdrawal, receipt of public charges, and management of deposit accounts.

A. On June 1, 2009, the Defendant arbitrarily terminated part of the deposit account of the damaged bank term deposit account (E) in the name of the victim industry bank in the name of Incheon or below, and then withdrawn KRW 2,000,000, which was in the custody of the said account, and embezzled by arbitrarily consuming the Defendant’s card payment and personal debt repayment.

B. On June 24, 2009, the Defendant arbitrarily terminated the fixed deposit account at the victim industrial bank C branch in the name of Incheon or lower, and then withdrawn KRW 6,000,000, which was the ownership of the damaged bank that was kept in the said account after the Defendant voluntarily terminated the said fixed deposit account in the name of the damaged bank that was kept in the business, and embezzled by arbitrarily consuming the Defendant’s card price and personal debt repayment at around that time.

(c)

The Defendant voluntarily terminated the account of time deposits (Account No. 1) in the name of the damaged bank (Account No. 1) in the name of the Defendant, and then withdrawn KRW 10,331,250, which was the ownership of the damaged bank that was kept in the said account, at the same time, at the same time, and at the same place as the above b. paragraph, the Defendant embezzled arbitrarily consumed the Defendant’s card price, personal debt repayment, etc.

2. 사기 피고인은 2011. 경에서 2012. 경 사이에 인천 이하 불상지에서 전화로 피해자 D로부터 “ 내가 뭉칫돈이 생겼는데 이를 내 산업은행 정기예금 계좌에 입금하고 싶다.

"... to enter money in the above account" upon request, "(b) to deposit money into the account of a fixed deposit and manage it."

“The purpose of “ was to make a false statement.”

However, the facts are the victim's name that the defendant had been managed at the time when he had harmed all the term deposit accounts in the victim's name, such as paragraph 1.