1. The judgment of the first instance court, including the claims extended and added by the Plaintiff in the trial room, shall be modified as follows.

1. The facts of the basis are as follows: (a) in front of the Sinyang-dong promotion apartment at the Sinyang-gu, Manyang-gu, Annyang-gu, Annyang-si, Annyang-si, Annyang-si, Annyang-si, on May 1, 2009, the Defendant suffered injury to the Plaintiff’s face by drinking the Plaintiff on the ground that the Plaintiff did not have a good door to the Defendant’s women-friendly Gu (hereinafter “the instant assault”) on the ground that he did not have a good door; and (b) the Plaintiff suffered injury to the Defendant’s satch, satch, etc. on the days of treatment; and (c) the fact that the Plaintiff was treated for a considerable period of time after receiving a diagnosis of the satch satitis, around October 16, 2012, may be acknowledged by taking full account of the overall purport of the pleadings by entering A’s evidence No. 1 and E.

2. Determination as to the existence of liability for damages

A. The Plaintiff asserts that the Defendant is obligated to compensate for the damages caused by the instant assault, as the Plaintiff suffered from a sloping disease due to the instant assault.

As to this, the defendant asserts that there is no causal relationship between the assault in this case and the plaintiff's hindrance, considering the fact that the plaintiff was treated for a considerable period of time after the assault in this case, and the plaintiff's hindrance occurred on the right side, which is not the left side of the defendant's assault, and that it was caused by living habits, such as shocking it or bullying, etc.

In full view of the following circumstances, which are acknowledged by comprehensively taking account of the results of the physical examination of the head of the Sinju University Hospital, i.e., the Plaintiff’s lack of a spathy for a spathy disease; even if the Plaintiff assaulted the left-hand spathy disease, shock is likely to occur due to a chronic decline; and there was no other accident to deem that the Plaintiff’s spathy disease was likely to occur during a considerable period of time; and there was no other accident to deem that the Plaintiff’s spathy disease occurred.