logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.04.20 2017고단906
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor of 10 million won and fine of 10 million won, Defendant B’s imprisonment with prison labor of 10 months and fine of 7 million won and Defendant C.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] Defendant C was sentenced to imprisonment for six months with labor for a violation of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, Including Intermediating, etc. of Commercial Sex Acts, at the Seoul Central District Court on June 19, 2015, and two years of suspended execution was decided on June 27, 2015, and is currently under suspended execution.

[Criminal facts]

1. Defendant A and Defendant B are the operators operating commercial sex acts in the trade name of Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Dtel 213, 609 and 1114, and Defendant B are the heads of the above establishments.

At the same time, from October 8, 2016 to December 15, 2016, Defendant A advertised the above establishment on the Internet site, including “F”, “G”, etc. from September 2016 to December 15, 2016, and Defendant B took charge of the management of revenues, etc. at the above establishment, and Defendant B took charge of the role of managing the above establishment such as pre-contract, guidance, cleaning, etc., and by having female employees, such as C and H, receive KRW 150,00 from the purchase of the name in the name in the name in the fact that the advertisement reported, and had them do sexual intercourse in order to arrange sexual intercourse.

2. Defendant C

A. On December 15, 2016, the Defendant received 160,000 won from the remaining sex purchase to the price for sexual traffic at around 12:10,000 from the above Dtel 1114 on December 15, 201, and engaged in sexual intercourse with the above sex purchase.

B. On December 15, 2016, at around 13:00, the Defendant received 1.60,000 won for sexual traffic from the south of the name influence purchase to the price for sexual traffic from the above Dtel 1114, and engaged in sexual intercourse with the above sex purchase.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. A protocol concerning the examination of each police suspect with respect to C or H;

1. Police seizure records and list of seizure;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of the contents of conversation with A in terms of telegram stored in B, such as mobile phone messages, photographs of business places, etc.;

1. Relevant Article of the Act and the choice of punishment for the crime;

A. Defendant A, Defendant A.

arrow