logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2016.04.21 2016노192
도로교통법위반(음주운전)
Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The decision of the court below on the summary of the reasons for appeal (eight months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The conclusion that the Defendant recognized the instant crime and reflected, and that the Defendant would not repeat the instant crime by selling a vehicle after the Defendant was prosecuted.

It is recognized that the defendant is moving to a marriage of a child, the defendant is moving to a marriage of a child, the spouse of the defendant is leading the defendant, and his family and branch wanting to leave the wife.

However, even though the Defendant had already been punished several times due to drinking driving, the Defendant again committed the instant crime, and the alcohol level of the Defendant’s blood was considerably high at the time of the instant crime, and in fact, the Defendant was causing a traffic accident due to the instant crime, and the Defendant’s age, sexual behavior, environment, motive and circumstance leading to the instant crime, means and consequence of the instant crime, and all of the sentencing conditions stated in the records and changes theory, including the Defendant’s age, sexual behavior, environment, motive and circumstance leading to the instant crime, means and consequence, etc., the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow