beta
Text
Defendant
A Imprisonment with prison labor of two years and six months, and Defendant B shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor of three years.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[2018 Highest 4882 【Name 482’s name misscambling (the same day’s suspension of indictment), which is the general responsibility of the scaming fraud organizations that take money by deceiving the victim by misrepresenting the public official, such as the prosecution, the Financial Supervisory Service, etc., or taking the identity of his/her family against the victim, is a person who solicits and manages the “defication” and “cash delivery books” that receive the money obtained from the victim, and instructs the crime.
The name-free boxes (the same day as the name of one, the E, or the F) are the members of the Bophishing fraud organization, which assumes the role of misrepresenting the victim as a public official, such as the prosecution, the Financial Supervisory Service, etc., or making the victim as a hostage, or making a false representation of his family.
On October 2018, the Defendants, as Malaysia, conspired to take a responsibility for cash delivery to prevent damage incurred by the victims of Malaysia from directly receiving or keeping the amount of damage caused by Malaysia in accordance with the direction of the liability for deception of their names by entering the Republic of Korea, or entering the Republic of Korea, and to receive KRW 30,000 per case.
1. Defendants’ theft
A. On November 8, 2018, at least 09:30 on an irregular place, the general responsibility on the name was made by phone phone to the victim G using a mobile phone, and, in misrepresenting that the account opened due to the theft of the name of the party involved was indicated as a substitute passbook used for the crime. The detailed content stated that “The prosecutor’s account was the one in which the name of the party involved was stolen and the one in which the crime was committed.”
The false statement that "It is confirmed on the website of the prosecutor's office because many victims have filed a complaint due to a face-to-face passbook" is connected to the fake website of the prosecutor's office and confirms the screen of the civil petition that is prepared as if it were investigated by case number 2588.