(영문) 서울고등법원 2017.11.07 2017나2017076

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울고등법원 2017.11.07 2017나2017076

집행판결

Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

3. The decision of the court of first instance is delivered with paragraph (1).

Reasons

1. The grounds for the judgment of the court of first instance shall be cited pursuant to the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act citing the judgment of the court of first instance

However, the following parts are either dismissed or added, and the defendant further judges the arguments made by this court:

[Supplementary part] Each "court" indicated in the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance, including three parallels below the two pages, shall be applied to all "U.S. courts" as "U.S. courts."

Each “instant lawsuit” indicated in the reasoning of the first instance judgment, including 3 pages 2 in the judgment of the court of first instance, shall be subject to both the “instant lawsuit” and the “US lawsuit.”

The 3rd five parallel of the judgment of the first instance shall be incorporated into "G company" (hereinafter referred to as "G").

The 3rd 6th son of the judgment of the first instance shall be incorporated into “G”.

Each “instant judgment” indicated in the reasoning of the first instance judgment, including six (6) acts under four (4) of the first instance judgment, shall be filed in the form of “instant U.S. judgment.”

The 5th day of the first instance judgment “the pronouncement and confirmation of the instant judgment” shall be deleted.

The 5th to 16th of the judgment of the first instance shall be followed as follows.

In order for a foreign court to be executed in Korea, the foreign court's final judgment is to be recognized as ① in accordance with the principle of international jurisdiction under the Acts and subordinate statutes of the Republic of Korea or treaties, ② the losing defendant has responded to the lawsuit even if he has not been served with the complaint or a document corresponding thereto and notice of date or order with the lawful method, or has not served with the time limit required for defense, ③ the approval of the final judgment does not violate the good morals and other social order of the Republic of Korea in light of the contents of the final judgment and litigation procedures, ④ mutual guarantee exists or in the country to which the foreign court belongs, and the requirements for approval of the final judgment are important in that

참조조문

-민사소송법 제420조

유사 판례

-서울고등법원 2018.08.21 2016누58026

-서울고등법원 2017.07.25 2016누71609

-서울고등법원 2017.07.25 2016나208657

-서울고등법원 2017.08.29 2016나2082158

-서울고등법원 2018.10.23 2018나2027124