The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

The defendant will pay 4.2 million won to the applicant AI.

1. The decision of the court below on the gist of the reasons for appeal is unreasonable because it is too unreasonable to punish the punishment (two years of imprisonment).

2. The judgment is a favorable circumstance that the defendant paid 69,450,000 won out of total 11,4350,000 won to the victims of the crime of this case, and that the defendant recognized all the crime of this case and divided his mistake. However, the crime of this case is very poor that the defendant repeatedly acquired money against a large number of parents during a considerable period of time under the pretext of linking a student and a newland fishing campaign, and the crime of this case is very poor, the defendant has the records of punishment for the same crime, the victims have not been recovered considerable damage, and other various sentencing conditions as shown in the argument of this case, such as the defendant's age, criminal records, sex, environment, family relations, motive and circumstance of the crime, etc., the punishment imposed by the court below is too unreasonable.

3. According to the conclusion, the appeal of this case by the defendant is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, on the grounds that the appeal of this case is without merit. Since an application for compensation order by the applicant for AI fraud filed in the trial of this case is well-grounded, it is accepted in accordance with Articles 25(1), 31(1), and 31(2) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Promotion, etc. of Legal Proceedings, and with respect to the declaration of provisional execution, it is so decided as per Disposition by applying Article 31(3) of the above Act.