logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원고등법원 2020.04.23 2020노21
강제추행치상등
Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The court below's scope of judgment in this case determined that the act of assault against the victim F among the facts charged in this case was dismissed on the ground of judgment, and sentenced the victim F to the violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc. and the violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc. and guilty as to the remaining facts charged. Since only the defendant filed an appeal on the ground of unfair sentencing as to the guilty part of the judgment below, the dismissal of prosecution was transferred to this court on the basis of the principle of no appeal, but excluded from the object of the judgment in this court.

2. The sentence imposed by the lower court (two years and six months of imprisonment) on the gist of the grounds of appeal is too unreasonable.

3. The circumstances favorable to the defendant are as follows: (a) the defendant led to the confession of all of the crimes of this case; (b) the appellate court made a large amount of money to the victims; and (c) the defendant expressed his intent that the victims would not be punished; (d) the defendant's parents and their assistants want to be punished against the defendant; and (e) the health conditions of the defendant and their families are not good.

However, in June 2019, the Defendant, along with the victim B (tentative name) and F, who is a kind of workplace club work, performed alcoholic beverages in a singing room, and carried out alcoholic beverages at a stroke-type 3 ethylmelt-type stroke, which contains psychotropic drugs ingredients, and then has the victim B (tentative name), F, and F, have the victim B (tentative name), F, the victim B, and F, the victim B, and the victim B who lost the mind due to this, were sent to the taxi, committed an indecent act against the victim by again sending the victim F to the taxi, and the Defendant took three images of the ethyl stroke-type stroke-type stroke, which are psychotropic drugs, and made the stroke-type stroke-type 3 stroke-type stroke. The residence of his residence.

arrow