1. The Defendant’s KRW 954,431 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate from August 10, 2015 to March 8, 2017, and the next day.

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. In fact 1), the Plaintiff driving a two-wheeled vehicle on August 17, 2015 and driving the two-wheeled vehicle on August 17, 2015, and driving the front of the three-laned vehicle in Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government at the same intersection distance as a three-lane off from the new village distance. The Plaintiff is a DNA taxi (hereinafter referred to as “Defendant vehicle”).

(2) In order for passengers to get off the taxi, they suffered injuries, such as the left-hand knife, the knife knife, the knife knife, etc. (hereinafter “instant accident”).

(2) The Defendant is a mutual aid business operator who entered into a motor vehicle mutual aid contract for the Defendant’s vehicle.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap 1, 3, 4 evidence, Eul 1, 5 evidence, the purport of the whole pleadings

B. According to the facts of recognition of liability, the defendant is liable to compensate the plaintiff for the damages caused by the accident in this case as a mutual aid business operator of defendant vehicle.

C. However, the limitation of liability is limited to the Defendant’s liability to 70% of the total damages in consideration of various circumstances, including the fact that the Plaintiff, as well as the Plaintiff, was making a stop on the three-lane, was negligent in neglecting the obligation of taxi passengers to live well in mind, and operating the taxi well, in consideration of the possibility of getting off the taxi.

(30%) 2. Scope of liability for damages

(a) Personal information A E;

B. Although the Plaintiff alleged that it was lost income of KRW 10,726,440 due to a disability on the ground of the luxal base, etc., the Plaintiff’s assertion that it was lost income of KRW 10,726,440 as a result of the Plaintiff’s physical examination of the Plaintiff’s injury, the Plaintiff’s assertion on this part, based on the premise of disability, is not accepted, is limited to the Plaintiff’s physical examination on the part of the Plaintiff’s injury, and the 4-5 luxal change of the luxal base and the luxal change of the lux

C. Wang medical expenses: The plaintiff alleged that 273,560 won was paid at the king medical expenses, but according to the statements in Eul evidence 7-1 to 4, respectively.